TREKK Series | Intussusception

In Guidelines, Medical Concepts by Ashley Lubberdink1 Comment

An 18 month female named Ella presents to the ED with a 1-day history of multiple intermittent episodes of abdominal pain (lasting ~5-10 minutes each) where she pulls into a knee-chest position, in addition to episodes of non-bloody, non-bilious emesis after her last 3 meals. Her appetite has been poor. Her bowel movements have been normal, with no diarrhea or hematochezia. There have been no unusual ingestions, no sick contacts, and no recent travel. There are no urinary tract symptoms or skin rashes. Her past medical history is unremarkable and she was born SVD at normal term. Her vaccinations are up to date. Vitals are all within normal limits, and clinically she is well hydrated. On examination, you believe you may have palpated a “squishy” mass that is 2 x 1 cm in the RUQ that causes Ella to cry.

What is your differential diagnosis in this case?

screen-shot-2016-11-04-at-11-57-30-am

Intussusception

Intussusception is the most common abdominal emergency of early childhood, and is usually idiopathic. The word intussusception refers to the invagination of intestine into a subsequent segment4. During this process, blood supply to the bowel can be compromised and transition from tissue ischemia to necrosis and perforation.

The vast majority of cases (80%) occur in children under 2 years, with the most frequent ages being 5-10 months.1 However, don’t be fooled, as it is rare but also possible to get intussusception in adulthood!

What is the Intussusception “classic triad” and what percentage of patients is it found in?

The “classic triad” consists of:

  • Crampy, intermittent abdominal pain
  • Vomiting
  • Bloody stools (some refer as “currant jelly” stools). This often is a late clinical finding.

The triad is only found in ~21% of patients2

  • *there may be a sausage shaped mass palpated in the RUQ

Intussusception refers to the “telescoping” or invagination of one part of the intestine into another. Ileocolic is the most common type of intussusception. This is when the terminal ileum intussuscepts through the ileocecal valve into the colon. Some other types of intussusception are ileoileal, colocolic, and ileoileocolic.3 Anatomical lead points occur in approximately 10% of intussusceptions, examples being Meckel’s diverticulum, enlarged lymph glands (i.e. Peyer’s patch) polyps, inflamed appendix, neoplasm (i.e. lymphoma).

What is the relation between HSP and intussusception?

Henloch-Schonlein Purpura (HSP) is a IgA mediated small-vessel systemic vasculitis. Intussusception is the most common GI complication of HSP. Submucosal hematoma or edema of the small bowel can act as a pathologic lead point, contributing to intussusception. In HSP, intussusception has a predilection to small bowel as opposed to idiopathic intussusception which typically is ileocolic.4

 Investigations for Intussusception:

  • Lab tests: not routinely indicated or helpful, however might be useful to rule out alternative diagnoses
  • Ultrasound: is the preferred method to make the diagnosis of intussusception.
  • Abdominal radiographs: are less sensitive/specific that ultrasonography and should not be routinely used to confirm or rule out the diagnosis.5
  • CT: can be time consuming for children who may require sedation, and exposes the patient to significant radiation. Generally, a CT is reserved for those in which other imaging modalities are unrevealing or to characterize pathological lead points.

What are the ultrasound findings of intussusception?

  • “Target” or “bulls-eye” lesion caused by layers of intestine within intestine. Colour duplex imaging can be used to detect development of ischemia.
  • Bedside ultrasound can be used to identify intussusception by a trained IP, if negative, a formal ultrasound should be obtained as some institutions have sensitivity/specificity reaching almost 100% each6
  • Below are still U/S images kindly contributed by Dr. Mark Tessaro. The first image is the typical “target/donut” lesion, the bottom left image is the oblique- “pseudokidney”, and the bottom right is the longitudinal “sandwich” view.

screen-shot-2016-11-04-at-11-47-51-am screen-shot-2016-11-04-at-11-48-30-am screen-shot-2016-11-04-at-11-48-06-am

What are the intussusception findings on Abdominal X-Rays?

  • Signs of bowel obstruction (air fluid levels, distended loops of bowel, absence of colonic gas)
  • Target sign: the intussusception on cross section appears like 2 concentric circles usually in RUQ, superimposed on the right kidney and represents peritoneal fat surrounding and within the intussusception3
  • Crescent sign: usually in the LUQ, a soft tissue density which represents the leading edge of intussusception outlined by gas in colon forming a crescent shape
  • An obscured liver margin
  • Pneumoperitoneum if there has been bowel perforation
  • **Abdominal X-rays may be normal, especially early on

To manage a presumed intussusception:

  1. Correct any hemodynamic instability

  • Fluid resuscitation as per PALS guidelines
  • Empiric antimicrobials if any signs of perforation
  1. If stable without signs of bowel perforation:

  • Air enemas usually preferred to water-soluble contrast enema
  • Stomach should be decompressed prior
  • Risk of perforation ~1%
  • Utilize U/S or X-ray with fluoroscopic guidance to confirm reduction
  • The utility of pre-procedural antibiotics for non-operative reduction is not established
  • *Small bowel intussusception are managed differently with 3 options are they are less likely to respond to non-operative reduction and more likely to reduce spontaneously
  1. If unstable, perforation present, or if step #2 fails to reduce intussusception

  • Consult the surgical team, or stabilize patient and transport to centre with Pediatric surgery

Recurrence

Recurrence will occur for 1/10 children with intussusception, with early recurrence (in 4-6 hours) in 2/100.2 Recurrence will be higher in patients who have a pathological lead point. These should also be managed in a non-operative fashion if there is no bowel necrosis. If there is even a small suspicion of bowel necrosis or failure to tolerate oral intake, the patient should be admitted for further in-hospital management.

Back to the Case:

The team ordered Ella a CBC and urinalysis which were both normal, in addition to an abdominal ultrasound and plain films to investigate the palpated mass. A target lesion was visualized on the ultrasound. There were no signs of bowel obstruction, perforation, or abnormalities on AXR. Radiology was consulted to perform an ultrasound guided air-enema study after the stomach was decompressed with a NG tube. This was done successfully, and Ella was kept overnight for monitoring post-procedure and was discharged home in the morning.

Editor’s note: This post is the third in a series led by Drs. Ashley Lubberdink and Kaif Pardhan translating the pediatric guidelines that have been developed by TREKK (TRanslating Emergency Knowledge for Kids). For more information and further pediatric emergency medicine guidelines, please visit the TREKK website.

References

2.
Fox S. Intussusception. Pediatric EM Morsels. http://pedemmorsels.com/intussusception/ . Published May 20, 2011. Accessed October 10, 2016.
4.
Episode 19 Part 2: Pediatric Gastroenteritis, Constipation and Bowel Obstruction. Emergency Medicine Cases. https://emergencymedicinecases.com/episode-19-part-2-pediatric-gastroenteritis-acute-constipation-bowel-obstruction/. Published January 7, 2012. Accessed November 4, 2016.
5.
Mendez D, Caviness A, Ma L, Macias C. The diagnostic accuracy of an abdominal radiograph with signs and symptoms of intussusception. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30(3):426-431. [PubMed]
6.
Gray M, Li S, Hoffmann R, Gorelick M. Recurrence rates after intussusception enema reduction: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2014;134(1):110-119. [PubMed]

Reviewing with the Staff

This case highlights the importance of considering intussusception in your differential diagnosis when evaluating abdominal pain in young children. Intussusception can be easily confused with simple gastroenteritis in children under two who are vomiting and unable to convey the intermittent nature of their abdominal pain. The astute clinician will keep in mind that the classic “currant jelly” stools are a late finding in intussusception and should not be relied upon to make the diagnosis. The vignette describes a palpable “squishy” mass in the RUQ, which can be a clinical finding in intussusception, but should also not be relied on, as in practice this is often not apparent. Another important point to consider is that not infrequently intussusception presents as altered mental status and/or listlessness in young children with the condition. When intussusception presents like this it can masquerade as sepsis, CNS pathology, or possibly exploratory ingestion. Again, it is imperative that the emergency room provider consider the diagnosis of intussusception in these patients lest the diagnosis be missed.

Ultrasound is the diagnostic modality of choice for intussusception. Plain radiographs may, at times, pick up cases of intussusception but are not to be relied upon when the diagnosis is suspected. It is nevertheless important that we continue to educate providers on the target and crescent signs of plain radiographs in the not uncommon event these findings are found incidentally while pursuing an alternative diagnosis. Prompt reduction via air enema is important to prevent the rare but important complication of bowel perforation. Recurrence occurs in 10% of patients with the majority of recurrences occurring beyond 6 hours. Because early recurrence is rare, it is not beneficial to complete an observation period in the emergency department following successful reduction in a patient who is tolerating oral fluids and otherwise well. The patient in the vignette was admitted overnight for observation, but one could have made a sound argument based on the available literature that discharge from the emergency department would have been acceptable and safe following successful reduction.

The bottom line is that intussusception is a very treatable condition, but it is the responsibility of the emergency room physician to consider this diagnosis so as not to delay appropriate interventions.

Dr. Zebulon Timmons
Pediatric Emergency Medicine Physician, Phoenix Childrens Hospital, Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship Director
(Visited 656 times, 1 visits today)
Ashley Lubberdink

Ashley Lubberdink

Ashley completed her MD degree at the University of Toronto and is doing her residency at McMaster University in the FRCPC EM program. She has special interests in Paediatric EM and Medical Education.
Ashley Lubberdink

Latest posts by Ashley Lubberdink (see all)

Kaif Pardhan

Kaif Pardhan

Kaif Pardhan is a medical education and politics geek who practices emergency medicine in Toronto, Ontario and pediatric emergency medicine in Hamilton, Ontario.
  • Rob Woods

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ecac1fed66c8cd38bf2dc533e26695a0dfb7e1dced45c3b4f39488139ed26166.png

    Here is a great AXR with both a target sign (RUQ) and crescent sign (just behind the L-spine) coming out of the target. In the half a dozen cases of intussusception I have seen personally, most kids are sleepy and in constant low level pain with episodes of worsening pain, but do not return to normal. FREQUENTLY I will see kids who present with episodic and often quite severe abdominal pain who are completely well when they come to the ED, and these kids usually have bowel colic often from constipation. Key is the age, 12-18 months is the peak for intussusception.